Fat fine

Gallatin National Forest cracks down on popular winter sport

Posted by Alex Sakariassen on Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:00 PM

Back in late January, Bozeman cyclists Bill Martin and Mo Mislivets rolled up to the trailhead leading to the Gallatin National Forest’s Yellow Mule Cabin a few miles south of Big Sky. It was a “beautiful, bluebird day,” Mislivets recalls, and the duo had left their travel options open, stocking the car with both cross country skis and their fat bikes—a bulkier breed of mountain bike with thick tires catered specially for pedaling through snow. The area hadn’t seen fresh snow for several days, leaving the trail up Buck Creek Ridge toward the cabin well-packed by snowmobile traffic.

UF-FatBike_courtesy_Bill_Martin_.jpg
  • Courtesy Bill Martin

Martin and Mislivets had been to plenty of U.S. Forest Service cabins, but both Yellow Mule and the Buck Ridge area were new to them. After a quick review of the signs highlighting permitted recreation, they opted to ride the fat bikes in. “Unfortunately,” Martin says, “we chose the wrong weapon of choice.”

Halfway to the cabin, which they’d rented for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day weekend, two Forest Service employees on snowmobiles pulled up to Martin. The first seemed genuinely excited to see a fat bike, Martin recalls, and wanted to check it out. But it was the second ranger’s response that sent Martin into shock.

“He was like, ‘You know, it’s illegal to be out here.’ I was pretty surprised,” Martin says.

The illegality the ranger referred to stems from a special order issued by Custer and Gallatin National Forest Supervisor Mary Erickson on Feb. 7, 2013. The order specifically prohibits using “a bicycle or other wheeled vehicle between December 1 and April 15” on all designated snowmobile and ski/snowshoe trails throughout the Gallatin. Martin had never heard of the rule; it wasn’t posted on the forest’s website, nor was there any signage indicating such a ban anywhere at the trailhead.

Martin says the incident left him confused. The rangers didn’t ticket him, and were both unclear on how widely the ban applied. With the day waning, Martin and Mislivets decided to continue on to the cabin.

“I just had this feeling like the rangers told us we were illegal but they weren’t going to issue a ticket,” Martin says. “I couldn’t wait to get back to research what he told me. I just didn’t have this strong feeling that we were indeed a criminal aspect up there.”

The next day, however, Martin and Mislivets decided to take a short fat bike jaunt farther along the Buck Ridge trail. That’s when Martin was stopped by a Forest Service law enforcement officer who issued him a ticket for $175 for violating the special order. Martin was shocked again, “and a little mad now.”

The incident highlights a potential problem for those who have taken to the trend of fat biking. Any new activity on public lands comes with the possibility of user conflicts, and fat bikes are no exception. Boyd Hartwig of the Lolo National Forest says his office is well aware of the fatties’ popularity, and recreation specialist Al Hilshey from the forest’s Missoula Ranger District notes a definite increase in the sport in recent winters. So far, the two are only aware of one complaint posted on an online forum last year by a cross country skier upset over alleged fat bike use of a ski track in the Rattlesnake’s main stem.

Hartwig says the Lolo hasn’t reached a point where user conflict has necessitated any kind of special order. “We don’t want to preempt something or step in where we don’t need to step in,” he explains. “If you don’t need to limit folks in an area because there’s no problem, then you shouldn’t.”

Officials with the Bitterroot National Forest issued a similar statement regarding fat bike use.

One week after Martin was fined, the Gallatin issued a press release addressing fat bike use. The release emphasized that the forest’s current travel management plan—completed in 2006—prohibits all wheeled vehicles from traveling on marked or groomed winter trails. “This decision pre-dated the common occurrence of fat bikes and the growing trend,” it states, adding that the forest “plans to review the potential for accommodating this growing popular activity in the future.” Gallatin spokesperson Marna Daley confirms the special order was intended to clarify existing restrictions in the forest travel plan.

Martin ultimately decided not to contest the citation after a Gallatin representative finally showed him a copy of the special order. “I felt confident that, yes, we did break a law,” Martin says. “We were up on a trail that wasn’t supposed to be ridden by a fat bike, and that was good enough for me.”

Martin hopes change will come to the Gallatin soon, but that such a change will include input from all winter trail user groups. In the meantime, he and Mislivets have changed the way they prepare for outings. While planning a recent fat bike tour in the Beaverhead National Forest, the duo called ahead to the ranger district they’d be traveling through to make sure they wouldn’t be violating any rules.

“It’s like you’ve got to do research,” says Martin, “before you can ride.”

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Bitterroot Resort would have allowed and encouraged this recreation opportunity, great shame that the senseless buracrats at the Forest Service take our tax dollars for their salaries then leave us behind and do what's easiest for them.

report 7 likes, 2 dislikes   
Posted by Rick Ranger on 03/22/2014 at 7:46 AM

Great, another pay to play in our own lands. What are we turning into, India where the bureacrats fine you as they please? Wouldn't surprise me if the FS officers are taking their cut of these proceeds. Sure log it as much as you like, but if you bother to even recreate in the forest you're gonna get fined!

We need some common sense.

report 8 likes, 4 dislikes   
Posted by Hunter Gadfly on 03/20/2014 at 1:34 PM

Why can't someone ride a fat bike there? I'm confused.

Don't we want people doing things like this? I mean, aren't people like Martin spending money in the areas where they're going to? Yeah, it could just be some lunch, snacks and gas, but that can add up when enough people do it.

Why are we restricting access?

This hurts businesses. Who wants this? Who is this benefiting, and why?

Greg Strandberg (D)
Candidate - House District 98

report 7 likes, 2 dislikes   
Posted by Greg Strandberg on 03/20/2014 at 2:21 AM

It must be made perfectly clear that fatbike riding had not reached the point where a special order was needed. In that respect the Gallatin is no different than the Lolo Forest. At the time I write this, March 19, 2014, Gallatin area bicyclists still do not know what had prompted the special order, or why the order was kept secret for a year. We are fairly certain that there has been a misinterpretation of some phrases and charts in the 2006 Gallatin NF travel plan. Let the people of Missoula, Hamilton, and Kalispell beware, when the Forest travel plans are being created and reviewed, make sure each plan clearly treats your preferred activity with fairness.

report 5 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by Greg Beardslee on 03/19/2014 at 7:47 PM
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment